Please enable javascript for full website functionality.

Texas A&M Case Study

The Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering at Texas A&M University uses Memmert laboratory equipment to support research focused on improving enhanced oil recovery (EOR). The laboratory relies on five Memmert heating ovens, a vacuum oven, and a humidity chamber to create the precise environmental conditions required for testing oil-bearing rock samples.

Oil extraction is far less dramatic than the famous scene from Giant where James Dean's character is covered by a gushing oil well. Modern recovery methods rely on carefully controlled engineering processes to maximize production while preventing uncontrolled releases.

Primary recovery uses the natural pressure within an oil reservoir. As pressure decreases, secondary recovery introduces water or natural gas through injection wells to restore pressure and improve extraction. Together, these methods recover approximately 30 to 50% of a reservoir's oil. As oil reserves decline and demand continues, tertiary recovery methods have become increasingly important. By injecting hot steam, gases, organic polymers, or surfactants, recovery rates can increase to 50 to 70%, depending on reservoir conditions (Muggeridge A., 2013).

Tertiary Recovery: Injecting CO2 or Surfactants

At the Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering, researchers investigate enhanced oil recovery by flooding oil reservoirs with surfactants and gases such as CO₂. CO₂ injection increases reservoir pressure while reducing oil viscosity as the gas partially dissolves into the oil.

Water flooding alone is often inefficient because adhesion forces between water and oil prevent the two from mixing effectively. Surfactants reduce surface tension, allowing oil droplets to deform more easily and disperse into the flood water. The efficiency of surfactant flooding depends on several factors, including:

  • Temperature
  • Salt concentration
  • Rock absorptive capacity
  • Reservoir pressure
  • Rock porosity (Iglauer S., 2009)

Gas injection may occur under miscible or immiscible conditions. Miscible flooding is more effective because the gas completely mixes with the oil, improving displacement toward producing wells. Under immiscible conditions, partial mixing still occurs, allowing some oil components to vaporize into the gas while some gas dissolves into the oil. Pressure, temperature, and oil composition determine whether miscibility can be achieved.

Controlled Conditions for Reliable Testing

Researchers perform experimental core flooding tests that simulate enhanced oil recovery under reservoir conditions of pressure and temperature. Oil-bearing rock samples are stored in high-pressure metal cylinders while syringe pumps inject fluids with precision. Measuring equipment monitors permeability, pressure drop across the rock core, and incremental oil recovery throughout each experiment.

Memmert heating ovens maintain the stable temperatures required for testing, typically ranging from 65°C to 120°C. The ovens are connected to external pumps and instrumentation through side access ports, allowing researchers to evaluate both established and emerging EOR technologies, including gas, surfactant, foam, and nanoparticle flooding.

Sample Preparation & Storage

Before testing, core samples undergo solvent extraction and are vacuum dried using a Memmert VO vacuum drying oven. Unconventional core samples, including oil-bearing shales, are particularly susceptible to moisture loss and the formation of microcracks. To preserve sample integrity, they are stored under controlled humidity and temperature in a Memmert HCP humidity chamber.

Memmert Equipment Supporting the Research

Several Memmert temperature control solutions play an important role throughout the testing process:

  • Heating Ovens provide precise temperature control for core flooding experiments.
  • Vacuum Drying Oven VO is used to vacuum dry rock samples following solvent extraction.
  • Humidity Chamber HCP stores moisture-sensitive shale samples under controlled humidity and temperature, helping prevent the formation of microcracks before testing.

Together, these systems help researchers produce reliable, repeatable results while evaluating new enhanced oil recovery technologies.

 

References & Sources:

Tovar et al. (2015). Experimental Investigation of Polymer Assisted WAG for Mobility Control in the Highly Heterogeneous North Burbank Unit in Oklahoma, Using Anthropogenic CO2

Iglauer S., W. Y. (December 2009). New surfactant classes for enhanced oil recovery and their tertiary oil. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

Muggeridge A., C. A. (December 2013). Recovery rates, enhanced oil recovery and technological limits. Philosophical Transactions A of The Royal Society.

Memmert Equipment Used

See More Customer Case Studies

Back To All Case Studies
atmocontrol instagram pdf techsupport touch twindisplay twitter phone email youtube linkedin play stainless facebook warranty mappin operation